Five engagements, each with a named scope, an evidence set, deliverables, a decision boundary, and a handoff. They are separate from LRI Studio, which designs the public site itself.
Five engagements
01
A page-by-page inventory of what your website actually publishes, compared against the records you supply, ending in a prioritized remediation register with owners. This is the one most boards should start with, and it has its own page.
02
Your records turned into a structured owner resource with protected access, plus the intake, approval and publication cadence that keeps it current after launch. A document site nobody maintains is worse than none, because it looks authoritative while going stale.
03
A time-bounded look at the public attack surface and the operating controls behind it — configuration, transport, headers, dependencies, administrative paths — with findings carrying severity, evidence, an owner and a retest state.
04
The review turned into a rhythm: scheduled checks, change awareness, an issue register that survives a redesign, and a short executive record of status and open risk.
05
A map of systems, records, owners, vendor handoffs and decision rights before any recommendation, then a roadmap sequenced by operating value and risk rather than by novelty.
Intended outcome
Each engagement ends with a working record and a decision you can actually take.
Decision boundary
LRI Connect provides software and operational services. Legal conclusions, privilege decisions, required disclosures, and final compliance determinations remain with the client and its qualified counsel.
Where most boards should start
